Written statement | Changes to the compliance allocation response claim. The High Court held that while making changes in the counterclaim, it deviated from the earlier position and advanced a new and contradictory argument. Also, the changes he made, which were against the basic points of the existing agreement. As a result, the court concluded that the respondent's actions were based on bad faith and that he tried to evade his obligations. 2024 C L C 205 | 489F cheque